The UW Chevron

online version of uwaterloo's independent press

Category: Volume 1, Issue 2

New organization helps students deal with landlords, employers

Author: Thomas Little

A new organization has appeared in the com m unity that will be useful to some students: the Kitchener-Waterloo Solidarity Network. The solidarity network model, which has appeared throughout North America, originated in Seattle with Seattle Solidarity (“SeaSol”) and is based around the principle of people in the community helping each other get justice for stolen wages and rent deposits or other unfair actions by bosses and landlords. Solidarity networks work with the individual or group to help them figure out a strategy for dealing with the boss or landlord, often using picketing and informational leafleting to put pressure on them. Read the rest of this entry »


CSIS: A Smart Career Choice?

Author: Thomas Little

Fall term has brought a lot of new faces to UW. If you’ve been in the SLC in the past couple of weeks, you might have noticed a few significant ones if you could fight past the crowds – professionally-dressed people on banners emblazoned with “WANTED: IT PROFESSIONALS” and “CSIS. SMART CAREER CHOICE.” This may not seem like much. The SLC has been subject to blatant advertising before. But what is CSIS? Perhaps a tech startup or a manufacturing company?

CSIS recruitment banner

September 26, 2013: One of two CSIS banners hanging in the SLC.

Read the rest of this entry »

The SLC Vendor Gauntlet

Author: Ilya Kolesnikov

Having vendors in the SLC contributes to the abundance of choices for foods, and once in a while, on those very special days, an assortment of retro and renowned video games. The vendors have their tactics to lure you over, some benign, such as colourful advertisements, but others that I refer to as vendor harassment. Though some vendors seem to be passive and mind their own business, reading and waiting for customers, it has become an annoyance to walk through the SLC as a result of some aggressive sale techniques. For example and coincidentally, the day before I started to write this article, a friend was in the SLC food court and two CIBC representatives called out to him by his first name. I could tell that my friend didn’t know them, making the situation awkward. It was also evident that he had been approached by them before and that they were using information previously gained to pitch a bank plan to him. Smart sales tactic or creepy, intrusive behaviour in what is supposed to be a comfortable space for students?

Confederate flag

October 2, 2013: Flag vendor displays the Confederate flag, a symbol of slavery and racism, in the SLC. It was taken down after he was approached by multiple students who asked that it be removed.

Overcrowding is another problem posed by vendors, specifically during the first week of every semester, though it is becoming a year-round issue. A heavy volume of students is optimal for vendors. However it is tedious to maneuver around. The vendors must get their messages across resulting in awkward eye-contact or literally being stopped in your tracks. As a rule of thumb it is generally best to walk past vendors (who needs more credit card debt on top of your growing tuition debt?) though one can take the extreme of rerouting and avoidance of the area. Don’t let sale tactics get to your head. It doesn’t make you a bad or immoral person if you are not interested in what the vendor is soliciting. However if you are being harassed, state that you are not interested, or walk-away. To what extent are vendors allowed to market their products or services? Should there be more regulations placed on vendors on what they can or cannot do?

[Editor’s note: Have com ments or stories about vendors in the SLC? Email our editors at]

This article appeared in Volume 1, Issue 2 of The Chevron on 4 October 2013.

A Campus Surveilled Redux

Author: The Editorial Collective

Thomas Little’s article in this issue reminds us that while it seems to be a new thing for students to be directly and openly recruited into CSIS’s surveillance apparatus (Canadia’s spy agency), it’s not at all a new thing for students to be surveilled on campus. An article in Volume 1, Issue 4 of the previous version of the Chevron, entitled “A Campus Surveilled” and written under the appropriate pseudonym “Winston Smith”, asked the question: who is watching us? Back then in 2010, they estimated between 150 and 200 security cameras in public areas on campus. Today there are probably more.

At the end of several of our articles in this issue, we invite readers to email us with comments or suggestions. Do not take this as boilerplate or a token invitation – we read every email sent to us. One of the biggest problems with some current campus journalism is that it does not actually reflect what students are thinking about, nor does it talk about interesting things people don’t already know about – as our predecessor did. Does the topic of surveillance interest you? Other ideas we considered were additional articles on tuition or a discussion on student space for studying and socializing. If you see anything you think deserves being investigated and published here, or if you have any commentary on campus media, send us an email and we’ll respond. We want to hear from you.

This article appeared in Volume 1, Issue 2 of The Chevron on 4 October 2013.